1 Early signs point to a positive outcome for poker
2 Issue of poker as a skill game not directly in play
3 Would an upholding of Weinsteins ruling make online poker legal in the US?A significant legal test for poker in America appears to have gone well for proponents of the game.Today, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in U.S. vs DiCristina, with the US appealing an earlier ruling that found the IGBA does not apply to poker.Not familiar with the DiCristina case? Heres an excellent (and concise) summary.Early signs point to a positive outcome for pokerWhile a decision has yet to be issued by the court, people close to the case saw much to like about todays proceedings:Live reporting was not allowed from within the courtroom.To re-emphasize, these are impressions of those close to the case and do not represent a guarantee of any particular outcome.Issue of poker as a skill game not directly in playMuch of what excited poker players about the original ruling by Judge Weinstein was his emphasis on poker as a game of skill more like chess than craps.But the amount of skill involved in poker was not directly in play during todays hearing, as the DoJ elected to not contest the ruling on that issue. Instead, the DoJ argued that Judge Weinstein had misinterpreted the IGBA, renedering the issue of skill vs chance moot.So what is the impact of the DoJ ignoring the skill issue? A poster on TwoPlusTwo clarified the implications of the DoJs decision:Again, this is all pre-decision speculation.Would an upholding of Weinsteins ruling make online poker legal in the US?No, although it would be a general step in that direction. Online gambling would still be subject to state laws and possibly to other federal laws.